<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MCE. Love it. Hate it.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148</link>
	<description>the race to win the living room</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:39:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Griffith</title>
		<link>http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148/comment-page-1#comment-53412</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148#comment-53412</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to capture and place on DVD library files original DVD cover art and Information?

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to capture and place on DVD library files original DVD cover art and Information?</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chariv</title>
		<link>http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148/comment-page-1#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>chariv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148#comment-998</guid>
		<description>hi,i am Charvi,come from China! hope we will be friends in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,i am Charvi,come from China! hope we will be friends in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148/comment-page-1#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148#comment-647</guid>
		<description>&gt; Somehow the Media Center doesn’t understand that I don’t want the same program 15 times, even if National Geographic airs it at different times every time.

I love the recording options in MCE. On my TiVo, I can specify first run or all; on MCE, I can add to that by channel and station. In this age of syndication, it&#039;s great to be able to tell your PVR to only record a program when it&#039;s on channel 7 without having to resort to setting up a manual recording.

&gt; I have to restart the Media Center every second day. It’s very unstable.

OK, I&#039;ll admit that I have a twice weekly defrag/reboot scheduled task set up, but I think that&#039;s just good practice on any computer, much less one that&#039;s constantly writing and deleting files on the hard drive. And it&#039;s not always Microsoft&#039;s issue that there are drivers that misbehave or programs with memory leaks. Can MCE be more stable? Sure. My Linux-based TiVo runs 24/7 without rebooting and it&#039;s been rock solid for the 5 years I&#039;ve owned it. But MCE, with a little automated maintenance, is getting pretty close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Somehow the Media Center doesn’t understand that I don’t want the same program 15 times, even if National Geographic airs it at different times every time.</p>
<p>I love the recording options in MCE. On my TiVo, I can specify first run or all; on MCE, I can add to that by channel and station. In this age of syndication, it&#8217;s great to be able to tell your PVR to only record a program when it&#8217;s on channel 7 without having to resort to setting up a manual recording.</p>
<p>&gt; I have to restart the Media Center every second day. It’s very unstable.</p>
<p>OK, I&#8217;ll admit that I have a twice weekly defrag/reboot scheduled task set up, but I think that&#8217;s just good practice on any computer, much less one that&#8217;s constantly writing and deleting files on the hard drive. And it&#8217;s not always Microsoft&#8217;s issue that there are drivers that misbehave or programs with memory leaks. Can MCE be more stable? Sure. My Linux-based TiVo runs 24/7 without rebooting and it&#8217;s been rock solid for the 5 years I&#8217;ve owned it. But MCE, with a little automated maintenance, is getting pretty close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148/comment-page-1#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148#comment-626</guid>
		<description>My MCE2005 is VERY stable. I would like to commend the people behind the product. I have an HP m1280n and have updated most of the drivers to the current versions. It is a rock and never requires a reboot. (Although, I do shut it down at night sometimes.)

I think it is VERY easy to use, but I realize what its boundarires are. I am not going to try to edit photos and video from within MCE using a rmeote control. For these tpyes of tasks, I easily exit to XP and do what I need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My MCE2005 is VERY stable. I would like to commend the people behind the product. I have an HP m1280n and have updated most of the drivers to the current versions. It is a rock and never requires a reboot. (Although, I do shut it down at night sometimes.)</p>
<p>I think it is VERY easy to use, but I realize what its boundarires are. I am not going to try to edit photos and video from within MCE using a rmeote control. For these tpyes of tasks, I easily exit to XP and do what I need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148/comment-page-1#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148#comment-622</guid>
		<description>&gt; I too hope that Windows Vista will be much better, and we’re working
&gt; hard to ensure it is. However, I disagree about the keeping one geeky
&gt; person around.

I don&#039;t think this is a Media Center issue ... as my family&#039;s resident
&quot;computer guy&quot;, it would seem that _all_ computers require one geeky
person for proper maintenance. ;)

&gt; I think a lot of the frustrations that &#039;hobbyists’ have about Media
&gt; Center is that the interface was designed for every day users, like
&gt; our mothers, and doesn’t offer the advanced features that hobbyists
&gt; have come to expect from other programs.

Maybe, but to your credit, you _do_ have an SDK ...

-Derek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I too hope that Windows Vista will be much better, and we’re working<br />
&gt; hard to ensure it is. However, I disagree about the keeping one geeky<br />
&gt; person around.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this is a Media Center issue &#8230; as my family&#8217;s resident<br />
&#8220;computer guy&#8221;, it would seem that _all_ computers require one geeky<br />
person for proper maintenance. ;)</p>
<p>&gt; I think a lot of the frustrations that &#8216;hobbyists’ have about Media<br />
&gt; Center is that the interface was designed for every day users, like<br />
&gt; our mothers, and doesn’t offer the advanced features that hobbyists<br />
&gt; have come to expect from other programs.</p>
<p>Maybe, but to your credit, you _do_ have an SDK &#8230;</p>
<p>-Derek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148/comment-page-1#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148#comment-620</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unfortunately we won’t have support for either EXIF or ratings in Windows Vista.&quot;

Won&#039;t support EXIF, even in Vista?  Is it really complicated or something?

&quot;I’d also suspect that the majority of Media Center users do their photo acquisition and triage at their desktop where it is much easier to perform functions like rotate, crop, etc.&quot;

Well, if you don&#039;t support anything like this, then of course they will...self fulfilling prophecy.

&quot;Media Center is simply not optimized around doing these tasks for large amounts of content.&quot;

Not optimised for detecting an EXIF tag and rotating a picture when showing it?  Hmm.  Does that need a lot of optimisation?

Of course, I second the &#039;requires daily rebooting&#039; comment, as I&#039;ve mentioned here before.  I&#039;ve installed all the updates now, and it&#039;s still the same.  I never noticed slowdowns before setting up a scheduled reboot - the system just used to cock up its connection to the guide database on a regular basis, and then fail to record anything/allow anything else to be scheduled until rebooted.  I&#039;m starting to feel like a broken record though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfortunately we won’t have support for either EXIF or ratings in Windows Vista.&#8221;</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t support EXIF, even in Vista?  Is it really complicated or something?</p>
<p>&#8220;I’d also suspect that the majority of Media Center users do their photo acquisition and triage at their desktop where it is much easier to perform functions like rotate, crop, etc.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, if you don&#8217;t support anything like this, then of course they will&#8230;self fulfilling prophecy.</p>
<p>&#8220;Media Center is simply not optimized around doing these tasks for large amounts of content.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not optimised for detecting an EXIF tag and rotating a picture when showing it?  Hmm.  Does that need a lot of optimisation?</p>
<p>Of course, I second the &#8216;requires daily rebooting&#8217; comment, as I&#8217;ve mentioned here before.  I&#8217;ve installed all the updates now, and it&#8217;s still the same.  I never noticed slowdowns before setting up a scheduled reboot &#8211; the system just used to cock up its connection to the guide database on a regular basis, and then fail to record anything/allow anything else to be scheduled until rebooted.  I&#8217;m starting to feel like a broken record though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy vt</title>
		<link>http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148/comment-page-1#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>andy vt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148#comment-619</guid>
		<description>&quot;Fortunately Media Center is a platform and someone has written a tool to edit DVR-MS files. Check out D-Cut.&quot;

MCE as a platform is what makes the PC based DVR worth the idiosyncrasies.  Because you own the box, you own the content.  Check out DVRMSToolbox (http://www.bluwiki.org/go/DVRMSToolbox_User_Guide), it provides this feature w/o user intervention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fortunately Media Center is a platform and someone has written a tool to edit DVR-MS files. Check out D-Cut.&#8221;</p>
<p>MCE as a platform is what makes the PC based DVR worth the idiosyncrasies.  Because you own the box, you own the content.  Check out DVRMSToolbox (<a href="http://www.bluwiki.org/go/DVRMSToolbox_User_Guide" rel="nofollow">http://www.bluwiki.org/go/DVRMSToolbox_User_Guide</a>), it provides this feature w/o user intervention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard G</title>
		<link>http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148/comment-page-1#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacenter.mattgoyer.com/archives/2006/07/19/1148#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Well Matt -

I can say as a long time beta tester and someone who loves the changes. I, like you hope that things work out in the long run, but as it stands I still have to rely on MC2k5 for my day to day use.

The problem isn&#039;t Microsoft, its the driver manufacturers who seem content to drag their feet. I can&#039;t imagine how much further we would be along if the drivers were more stable and more frequently updated.

The polish is starting to show in the UI. You folks really continue to outdo yourselves... there isn&#039;t a build that doesnt come that things dont get better, faster, more stable etc.

Heck a few short months ago I couldn&#039;t even install on my MC box... its come a LONG way. Keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Matt -</p>
<p>I can say as a long time beta tester and someone who loves the changes. I, like you hope that things work out in the long run, but as it stands I still have to rely on MC2k5 for my day to day use.</p>
<p>The problem isn&#8217;t Microsoft, its the driver manufacturers who seem content to drag their feet. I can&#8217;t imagine how much further we would be along if the drivers were more stable and more frequently updated.</p>
<p>The polish is starting to show in the UI. You folks really continue to outdo yourselves&#8230; there isn&#8217;t a build that doesnt come that things dont get better, faster, more stable etc.</p>
<p>Heck a few short months ago I couldn&#8217;t even install on my MC box&#8230; its come a LONG way. Keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.499 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-19 22:57:00 -->
